10 июля в клубе Хлеб
состоится концерт группы COLOSUSS
приглашаем группы и музыкантов принять участие в концерте а также в этот момент будут снимать документальный фильм о роке ! нужна массовка
состоится концерт группы COLOSUSS
приглашаем группы и музыкантов принять участие в концерте а также в этот момент будут снимать документальный фильм о роке ! нужна массовка
>Зачем?
>нужна массовка
а то колосусы перед пустым залом запарились выступать
>нужна массовка
а то колосусы перед пустым залом запарились выступать
внормально , тёлок на массовку пригласите .. толпу какуюнить (пох),
а то фсё боевики наши оё
а то фсё боевики наши оё
пипец, иду!))) а то я 18-го пролюбил ибо думал, что они 19-го
>в этот момент будут снимать документальный фильм о роке !
>http://colossusminiseries.com
Охоспаде!
Охоспаде!
Colossus© is a 3-episode mini-series that uses a typical Reality-TV production set-up, to create a one-of-a-kind cinematic adventure, which takes the concept of Reality TV and literally tears it inside out. This epic Rocumentary follows the hard-boiled adventures of British ex-patriot businessman Clark Larson, as he assembles an international team of talented young musicians and filmmakers to create what he calls, “The Greatest Artificial Rock Band in Russian History”.
Clark is a hard-knocking, ex-patriot businessman who has been living in Russia off-and-on for 15 years and through the help of his many dubious connections, has been very successful. He is now a multi-millionaire who plans on returning to his home-city of London for early retirement. But before he returns, he has decided to put his entire life on hold to pursue a life-long dream. His dream is not another business deal or romantic conquest…. not a yacht or plane… it’s a movie about a band; but not just any band.
Clark is a hard-knocking, ex-patriot businessman who has been living in Russia off-and-on for 15 years and through the help of his many dubious connections, has been very successful. He is now a multi-millionaire who plans on returning to his home-city of London for early retirement. But before he returns, he has decided to put his entire life on hold to pursue a life-long dream. His dream is not another business deal or romantic conquest…. not a yacht or plane… it’s a movie about a band; but not just any band.
he first jet to use a swept wing was the ME262 fighter from WW2. It is interesting that both the F86 and the MIG15 used the same wing design taken from the ME262. A fast airfoil needs to be thin but it is difficult to make a thin wing strong enough. A thin wind also does not allow the retractable landing gear to be stowed in the wing. A swept wing is a trade off that helps to solve the problem of combining these design requirements.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
Progressive1
It would not surprise me in the least to find that the big airline companies and manufacturing companies are withholding progress for the sake of profit.
It is the sad truth that capitalism can have disastrous effects on innovation. I hope that some day planes like this will come to be produced, but it may require a fundamental paradigm shift in America.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
lwatcdr
@motytrah It maybe a better for short haul and it may even work and work well. I was just trying to point out that this story is way over simplifying everything. The thing is that even 737s are used on some long fights! I flew in one from DFW to Seattle! What this design should do is allow the plane to climb faster and fly high a little slower.
The thing is that until they build it the fuel savings really do seem to be in the area of too good to be true.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
dajoe
Boeing and Airbus know this. They have to do a lot of things because of what makes customers feel safe when they get on the plane. That little upturned end of the wing that increases economy took years (probably decades) before people would be OK with. The most glaring example is the seats. The safest way to position the seats would be to have them all facing the back of the plane. Nobody wants to ride on that. Windows add weight, complexity, and reduce structural integrity. But who wants to fly in a plane without windows?
Like
Reply
1 year ago
damasterwc
@careydw - people want to get to their destinations faster, not slower. they will fly on airlines that worry more about them than how many people they can cram inside.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
damasterwc
let's fly faster, not slower... scramjets now!
Like
Reply
1 year ago
ursus
While this is a nice plan there are a number of items that show some lacking.
Engines are put on wings partially because doing so allows the wing to handle a lower load - ie it can be lighter. I doubt if you'd see engine in the tail section since a catastrophic failure can cripple an aircraft's hydraulics. (think DC-10 flight 232 landing in Iowa City).
Putting three engines so far back from the centre of gravity seems odd but at least they've increased the size of the horizontal stabilizer (tailplane) to compensate for it. At first glance it seems way out of proportion.
I don't see how the engines seem to be connected to the fuselage, the middle engine seems to be suspended in the middle of the fan shroud.
The wing itself seems to be awfully high ratio (depth to span) but for a high altitude cruise it may be okay.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
Progressive1
It would not surprise me in the least to find that the big airline companies and manufacturing companies are withholding progress for the sake of profit.
It is the sad truth that capitalism can have disastrous effects on innovation. I hope that some day planes like this will come to be produced, but it may require a fundamental paradigm shift in America.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
lwatcdr
@motytrah It maybe a better for short haul and it may even work and work well. I was just trying to point out that this story is way over simplifying everything. The thing is that even 737s are used on some long fights! I flew in one from DFW to Seattle! What this design should do is allow the plane to climb faster and fly high a little slower.
The thing is that until they build it the fuel savings really do seem to be in the area of too good to be true.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
dajoe
Boeing and Airbus know this. They have to do a lot of things because of what makes customers feel safe when they get on the plane. That little upturned end of the wing that increases economy took years (probably decades) before people would be OK with. The most glaring example is the seats. The safest way to position the seats would be to have them all facing the back of the plane. Nobody wants to ride on that. Windows add weight, complexity, and reduce structural integrity. But who wants to fly in a plane without windows?
Like
Reply
1 year ago
damasterwc
@careydw - people want to get to their destinations faster, not slower. they will fly on airlines that worry more about them than how many people they can cram inside.
Like
Reply
1 year ago
damasterwc
let's fly faster, not slower... scramjets now!
Like
Reply
1 year ago
ursus
While this is a nice plan there are a number of items that show some lacking.
Engines are put on wings partially because doing so allows the wing to handle a lower load - ie it can be lighter. I doubt if you'd see engine in the tail section since a catastrophic failure can cripple an aircraft's hydraulics. (think DC-10 flight 232 landing in Iowa City).
Putting three engines so far back from the centre of gravity seems odd but at least they've increased the size of the horizontal stabilizer (tailplane) to compensate for it. At first glance it seems way out of proportion.
I don't see how the engines seem to be connected to the fuselage, the middle engine seems to be suspended in the middle of the fan shroud.
The wing itself seems to be awfully high ratio (depth to span) but for a high altitude cruise it may be okay.
meteor , 